Ann Watson, managing director of the vocational qualification awarding organisation EAL, has challenged the Government's Specification of Apprenticeship Standards for England (SASE), which was published yesterday, saying that this initiative "failed to recognise the needs of the advanced skills sectors which most need support when it comes to apprenticeships".
Watson's remarks came after it emerged that under the new guidelines the Level 2 NVQ in Performing Engineering Operations (PEO) would be left out of the Advanced Apprenticeship in Engineering for those apprentices in England. "Apprentices in Wales and Scotland can still access this important foundation qualification which immediately creates a two tier system of apprenticeships across the UK. This is something I am sure Mr Hayes did not intend to put in place," she said.
She continued: "Although on the surface SASE seems a really positive move, the engineering and manufacturing industries will suffer due to a lack of understanding of the fundamental skills needed to operate safely and effectively in industry. In particular, the loss of PEO means that for many young people they will lose the chance to gain fundamental engineering skills in a safe, off-the-job environment. This could have serious health and safety consequences, which may put people off a career in the sector."
Watson continued: "The employers and colleges we work with are up in arms about this. Contrary to what the Government says, the frameworks going forward do not actually reflect what engineering employers want and force every sector to have an apprenticeship framework based on the same qualification mix. It destroys the ability of Sector Skills Councils and awarding organisations to be able to cater for the specific requirements of an industry. A one size fits all mentality is not appropriate for sectors which require bespoke, tailored training. In asking us to provide this, the Government is undoing what has made the engineering and manufacturing industries flagship examples of how apprenticeships should be designed and delivered."
Concluding, Watson said: "It is disappointing that, despite the high billing apprenticeships have had with the Coalition Government since it came into power, it has failed to listen to sector needs. This is very concerning, given their high commitment to the delivery and quality of apprenticeships that they should be so prescriptive and devalue the apprenticeship in the engineering and manufacturing sector in one piece of legislation."